Fiji has a long history of squatting and informal housing, particularly in the urban and existing on state-owned, private, and customary land. Over the years, squatters and informal settlements have become a permanent feature of Fiji's urban landscape and acceptable to the Government, hence, encouraging greater perceived tenure security through provisions of basic services and rare instances of evictions. Some settlements have existed for over a century, notably on state-owned land. Settlements on private (freehold) and disputed state land undergo different situations. They are usually underserviced with basic infrastructure, least prioritized for tenure security, loomed with eviction threats, and often suggested for relocation soon. Sometimes, the Government steps in to provide alternate shelter options, i.e., resettlement on the urban fringe or in the rural or to an existing informal settlement on state-owned land, through settlement upgrading programs and sometimes the government instigates eviction. The differing nature of tenure insecurities between customary, state, and private land contribute to different perceptions of how settlers regard tenure insecurity. Thus, using case studies of settlements on customary, state, and private land in Fiji, this talk will discuss the mechanism of tenure insecurities and the stakeholders involved. It will also discuss the settlers' perception of tenure insecurity leading to possible eviction and how it affects their present living situation and services accessibility. However, at some point, all settlements struggle with tenure insecurity, irrespective of the Government's involvement, due to constant fear of eviction threats and exclusion from settlement upgrading and service accessibility. The paper discusses the nature and causes of eviction threats; how often does it occur? How do the informal settlers and squatters perceive it? And how it affects the living conditions and service accessibility of settlements on customary vs state-owned land?